Review note: John Erickson for State Senate and Brian Goldsmith for CA State Senate may have more bias because they are advocacy voter guides compared to other formal government and nonprofit journalism sources.
- sos.ca.gov (opens in a new tab)CA Secretary of State — Statement of Vote, June 2, 2026 primary (certified 2026-07-10)
- ballotpedia.org (opens in a new tab)Ballotpedia — June 2026 California primary
- johnerickson4senate.com (opens in a new tab)John Erickson for State Senate — campaign site (biography, priorities)
- briangoldsmith.com (opens in a new tab)Brian Goldsmith for CA State Senate — campaign site (biography, motivation, priorities)
- smdp.com (opens in a new tab)Santa Monica Daily Press — John Erickson Makes His Case for State Senate (council record, quotes)
- smdp.com (opens in a new tab)Santa Monica Daily Press — Brian Goldsmith Makes His Case for State Senate, One Conversation at a Time (biography, quotes)
- wehoonline.com (opens in a new tab)WeHo Online — Threatened Removals, No Vote: West Hollywood's SB 79 Council Meeting Goes Until 12:30 A.M. (Erickson conduct, no-vote outcome)
- dailybruin.com (opens in a new tab)Daily Bruin — Erickson, Goldsmith advance to November general for California Senate District 24 (primary results)
- sos.ca.gov (opens in a new tab)Cal-Access raw data export — California Secretary of State
Last updated September 24, 2026.
State of California
State Senator, District 24
This person holds your district's seat in the California State Senate (4-year term).
This is an open seat. Both November candidates are Democrats. John M. Erickson led the June primary with 20.5%, raising $862,778. Brian Goldsmith took 18.3% after raising $4,281,548, the largest legislative campaign fund on this ballot. The gap was 2.2 points, one of the closest Senate contests. The district covers West Los Angeles and part of the Westside and South Bay.
The winner holds one of 40 State Senate seats for a four-year term, inside a 12-year lifetime cap on service in Sacramento. Senate districts are twice the size of Assembly districts, terms run twice as long, and the Senate confirms the Governor's appointments. Because this seat is open, whoever wins starts without seniority.
With two Democrats separated by two points, party is not the axis. The defining fact is a fundraising gap of nearly five to one that produced a second-place finish — $4.28 million against $862,778, and the smaller campaign led. Both drew heavily on individuals rather than committees. Weigh the candidates themselves, because neither money nor party separates them in the way you might expect.
John M. Erickson
John Erickson is the West Hollywood city councilmember and a former mayor. Before local office he worked at Planned Parenthood Los Angeles and at the Alliance for a Better Community. As a councilmember he helped pass one of the highest minimum wages in the county. He also helped cap yearly rent increases at three percent. Santa Monica later copied that rent cap.
In May 2026 the West Hollywood council debated a local housing plan tied to a new state law. Erickson argued the city's rules already covered it. He told residents comparing the debate to redlining to stop using what he called racist tropes. The council did not vote that night. The issue moved to a later meeting. He says he is running because the state lets special interests come before families.
Erickson promises to expand renter protections across the state. He wants more school funding per student and faster disaster recovery help for fire hit areas. He says he wants cheaper health care and insurance. He also wants to expand local homelessness programs statewide.
Brian Goldsmith
Brian Goldsmith grew up in West Los Angeles. He has never held elected office. He worked as a political journalist covering presidential campaigns. He produced Katie Couric's interview with Sarah Palin. He later co-founded investment and crowdfunding firms in tech. He is now a media consultant. He is raising two children in the district with his wife, a teacher.
He says running for the Senate was not something he had planned. He says recent wildfires and rising costs changed his mind. He believes Sacramento needs different leaders. He has never held office, so there is no voting record or lawsuit to weigh. Voters have only his career and campaign platform to judge.
Goldsmith promises to make California more affordable for families and small businesses. He wants faster recovery help for fire hit communities. He wants better results in early reading and math. He also backs a bigger film and TV tax credit to keep jobs in the state.
Record in office
This is an open seat: no candidate on the November ballot currently serves in the California Legislature or U.S. Congress, so there is no legislative record to compare here. These records cover only those offices.
Financial info
- Small donors
- Individuals
- PACs & committees
- Businesses & other orgs
- Self-funding
Brian Goldsmith
Primary — $4,281,548
- Small donors$2,612<1%
- Individuals$2,253,94553%
- PACs & committees$83,0002%
- Businesses & other orgs$74,1002%
- Self-funding$1,861,80044%
November — $217,650
- Individuals$168,95078%
- PACs & committees$31,00014%
- Businesses & other orgs$17,7008%
John M. Erickson
Primary — $862,778
- Small donors$3,863<1%
- Individuals$400,93946%
- PACs & committees$330,00038%
- Businesses & other orgs$127,34715%
- Self-funding$150<1%
November — $43,120
- Individuals$8,27019%
- PACs & committees$33,85079%
- Businesses & other orgs$1,0002%
1Figures are CA Form 460 filings through June 30, 2026 by committees controlled by each candidate, and can include transfers from a candidate's earlier committees. Semi-annual reports covering January–June 2026 were due July 31, 2026, so some totals lag a period behind. Per the California Secretary of State's Cal-Access raw data export, retrieved 2026-09-21.
2Total is itemized (Schedule A) contributions and self-funding loans dated after the June 2, 2026 primary, through June 30, 2026 — small-dollar unitemized (under $100) contributions aren't independently dated in Cal-Access's raw export, so they aren't reflected here and this may undercount true small-donor activity since the primary. This also doesn't include money reported only on 24-hour late-contribution reports (Form 497) that haven't yet appeared in a periodic Form 460 filing. Per the California Secretary of State's Cal-Access raw data export, retrieved 2026-08-30.